I wrote, too optimistically:
It's easy to write correct string operations, even in C, even for null-terminated strings in fixed-size buffers — and security-conscious C programmers often do.
Barry Kelly objected:
I don't agree that it is easy [...] to write correct code in C for manipulating null-terminated strings in fixed sized buffers, for a simple reason: if you can't let the fixed length follow the string, either via static typing or dynamically, then normal procedural abstraction will tend to hide the length and lead to errors later.
I didn't find that very convincing until a few weeks ago, when I spent a late night tracking down a mysterious buffer overflow: I had used a “safe” string operation with the wrong buffer size.